🔗 Share this article

Imagine this: a happy Rasmus Højlund in a Napoli shirt. Next, place that with a sad-looking Benjamin Sesko in a Manchester United kit, appearing like he's missed a sitter. Don't worry finding an actual photo of him missing; context is the enemy. Now, add statistics in a large, comical font. Don't forget some emoticons. Share it everywhere.

Would you mention that Højlund's tally includes scores in the Champions League while his counterpart does not compete in Europe? Certainly not. And will you note that several of Højlund's goals were scored versus Belarus and Greece, or that Denmark is much stronger to Sesko's Slovenia and generates many more chances. If you manage social media for a large outlet, raw interaction is your livelihood, United are the prime target, and context is your sworn enemy.

Thus the wheel of content spins. The next job is to scan a lengthy interview with Peter Schmeichel and find the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where he prefaces his remarks by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, cut that. Nobody needs that. Simply ensure "strange" and "the player" are paired in the title. The audience will be outraged.

The Season of Promise and Hasty Opinions

The heart of fall has long been one of my favourite times to observe football. Leaves fall, winds shift, the teams and tactics are newly formed, all is novel and yet patterns are emerging. The stars of the coming months are staking their claims. The transfer window is closed. Nobody is mentioning the quadruple yet. Everyone are in contention. Right now, all is possibility.

Yet, for many of the same reasons, this period has also been one of my least favourite times to consume news on football. For while no outcomes are decided, something must always be getting settled. Jack Grealish is resurgent. Florian Wirtz has been a crushing disappointment. Could Semenyo be the top performer in the league right now? We need an answer immediately.

Sesko as The Prime Example

In many ways, Sesko feels like Patient Zero in this context, a player inextricably trapped between football's opposing, non-negotiable forces. The need to withhold final conclusions, to let layers of technical texture and tactical sophistication to develop. And the demand to produce permanent verdicts, a conveyor belt of takes and memes, out-of-context criticisms and meaningless comparisons, a square that can not truly be circled.

I do not propose to provide a substantive analysis of Sesko's time at United to date. He has been in the lineup on four occasions in the Premier League in a highly unpredictable team, found the net twice, and taken a mere of 116 touches. What precisely are we analysing? Nor will I attempt to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts duel thrillingly on a podcast over whether Sesko needs ten strikes to be deemed successful this year (Neville), or whether it's really more like twelve or thirteen (Wright).

A Cruel Environment

Despite this I loved watching him at his former club: a powerful, screeching racing car of a striker, playing in a team ideally suited to his abilities: given the license to attack but also the freedom to fail. Partly this is why United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be at the moment: a place where "harsh judgments" are summarily issued in about the time it takes to watch a pre-roll ad, the club with the largest and most pitiless gulf between the patience and space he requires, and the opportunity he is going to get.

We saw a case of this over the national team pause, when a viral chart conveniently informed us that the player had been judged – by a wide margin – the poorest acquisition of the recent market by a survey of football representatives. Naturally, the press are not the only ones in such behavior. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of fake followers: all parties with skin in the game is now basically operating along the same principles, an environment explicitly geared for provocation.

The Psychological Toll

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What is happening to us? Are we aware, on some level, what this endless stream of aggravation is doing to our brains? Separate from the essential weirdness of being a player in the center of this, aware on some surreal chain-reaction level that each aspect about them is now basically material, commodity, open-source property to be repackaged and traded.

Indeed, in part this is because it's Manchester United, the entity that keeps nourishing the cycle, a big club that must constantly be generating the big feelings. However, in part this is a temporary malaise, a swing of opinion most visibly and harshly observed at this season, about a month after the window has closed. All summer long we have been coveting footballers, praising them, drooling over them. Now, only a handful of games later, many of those same players are now being disdained as failures. Is it time to worry about Jamie Gittens? Did Arsenal actually need their striker wise? What was the purpose of Randal Kolo Muani?

The Bigger Picture

It feels appropriate that Sesko meets their rivals on the weekend: a team at once on a long unbeaten run at home in the league and somehow in their own situation of feverish crisis, like submitting a missing person’s report on a person who popped to the store 30 minutes ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah finished. Alexander Isak an expensive flop. The coach losing his hair.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the narrative of football has begun to supplant football itself, to influence the way we view it, an entire sport reoriented around talking points and immediate responses, something that happens in the backdrop while we browse through our phones, unable to disconnect from the constant flow of takes and more takes. It may be this player taking the hit at present. However, everyone is sacrificing something here.